LAWCLERK
Lawyerist Rating for LAWCLERK
Rating Breakdown
Our Rating: 4.6/5
Our rating is based on our subjective judgment. Use our resources—including our rating and community ratings and reviews—to find the best fit for your firm.
Community Rating: 3.7/5 (based on 3 ratings)
The community rating is based on the average of the community reviews below.
Composite Rating: 4.3/5
The composite rating is a weighted average of our rating and the community ratings below.
4.3/5
What is LAWCLERK?
LAWCLERK is a nationwide Freelance Lawyer and Virtual Associate marketplace. Attorneys who are looking to cover overflow work, one-off projects, or even get started in another area of law will find their services helpful. They have project-based or subscription pricing models. The web app makes it easy to communicate, share documents, and even pay or get paid for freelance services.
Starting Cost: Free
- Easy setup
- Legal Specific
- National Reach
- Not Receptionists
LAWCLERK Features
Customer Experience & Support
/5
Price & Value
/5
Security
/5
Innovation & Future-Proofing
/5
Great start so far.
It is free to sign up. I started with using them for a simple trust and pour-over will that I did not have time to get done. I have hired them to prepare a complex complaint, prepare a memorandum for a case that I was mediating, and some other estate planning drafts.
Its like ‘Air BnB” in that you get to check out attorney’s ratings before selecting one. Other customers have rated the contract attorneys on meeting deadlines and quality of work.
I have been completely satisfied with the work product and the cost thus far. A rep from the company reaches out for feedback every time I place an order and follows up after the completion of the project.
Time Sink
1) The lawclerks on this site routinely miss deadlines. Even when the deadlines are given in writing and loaded on the site.
2) I’ve gotten an excessive amount of incomplete work. Work missing appropriate captions, signature blocks, referencing exhibits that aren’t included. Purporting to support motions with affidavits that don’t exist and haven’t been written.
3) Often when I’ve used this site, I’ve given the lawclerk other pleadings from the same case, for the purpose of orienting them to the relevant procedural history. I’ve been disappointed in the number of briefs that came back with just copy/paste of the prior other pleadings. If I had wanted a copy paste job, I wouldn’t have hired someone at a $1000 price point to write a brief.
Honestly, the worst part is that when you ask a clerk to revise work to correct this, the Company will side with the clerk if they complain. Even though they gave my money back, it was a massive loss in terms of my time trying to get good work out of them and delay in my cases.
Excellent way to leverage talent!