This post is part of "Law School Exams," a series of 12 posts. You can start at the beginning or see all posts in the series.

For those law school students who have the option of using a computer or hand-writing an exam, here are some factors to consider before presuming that the benefits of typing outweigh those of writing by hand.

Today I took the first of my 2L exams. After traveling through a blizzard to make it to school, I was unpleasantly surprised when my computer, running ExamSoft‘s Softest application, hung on restart and deleted my test template.

I could still take the exam, having lost only a few minutes to the rip-the-battery-out-and-pray battle with my Vista system, but it required a lot more physical effort, putting a pencil to paper in a dreaded “blue book” (not to be confused with the alternate law school enemy, the Blue Book).

After a few deep breaths, I recalled the fundamental rules for writing out a law school essay by hand:

  • Outline your answer first
  • Use lots of subheadings
  • Double-space and write legibly

When I finished the exam, with just a minute to spare, I was disheartened by the fact that my essay was probably many fewer words than my classmates’ and that my handwriting might be off-putting to the professor. But then I thought about some of the benefits of being forced into the hand-writing scenario:

  • I was darn sure about what I wrote before I wrote it. Writing by hand takes much more precision than the stream of consciousness created by typing frantically for three hours straight.
  • I had zero post-exam stress about the test file uploading or submitting correctly. In fact, it was quite cathartic to walk to the front of the room with a tidy stack of papers, literally leaving it behind me when I walked out.
  • My exam will stand out. I guess this could be good or bad. But let’s say the prof is facing a pile of identical printouts and just a few hand-made essays. I would like to think that having my exam read first, or last, might be a good thing. If nothing else, the professor will probably have to read my exam more slowly, which I can only hope means he won’t skim over any bits that will garner some points.

The lesson here is that there is benefit in thinking through a problem deeply enough to put it into words on a tangible page. Whether or not you choose to hand-write any of your exams, it can’t hurt to approach every essay as if your professor was going to be muddling through your chicken-scratch: make it worth reading.

Good luck to all the other law students who are currently suffering through exams!

Featured image: “Young female student with others writing notes in the classroom” from Shutterstock.

Read the next post in this series: "."

The Small Firm Scorecard example graphic.

The Small Firm ScorecardTM

Is your law firm structured to succeed in the future?

The practice of law is changing. You need to understand whether your firm is positioned for success in the coming years. Our free Small Firm Scorecard will identify your firm’s strengths and weaknesses in just a few minutes.

Leave a Reply