Naming a Law Firm

Naming a law firm is one of the first things you’ll have to do when starting your new firm. If you’re a solo practitioner, this is a somewhat easier task, since there is no discussion about whose name comes first. However, both solo practitioners and small firms need to consider state rules and ethical issues when noodling law firm names.

You can discuss The Shingle Life in the comments, in the LAB, or on Twitter using the hashtag #shinglelife.

The Ethics of Naming a Law Firm

There are two of us in the law practice, so there was no question our list of potential law firm names would include both of our last names. We also quickly decided that listing the names in alphabetical order sounded much better. So the big decision came when we had to choose what to include in our law firm name other than our actual surnames. Popular choices included things like “& Associates,” “Law Group,” and “The Law Offices of.”

In our opinion, all of those choices toed the line of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. The PA rules are identical to the Model Rules on this issue, but there have not been any opinions from the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board directly on point. There are cases from other jurisdictions, such as Minnesota, which hold that “[t]he use of the word ‘Associates’ or the phrase ‘& Associates’ in a law firm name, letterhead or other professional designation is false and misleading if the use conveys the impression the law firm has more attorneys practicing law in the firm than is actually the case.”

Our specific concerns were Rules 7.1 and 7.5. Rule 7.5(a) states:

A lawyer shall not use a firm name, letterhead or other professional designation that violates Rule 7.1. A trade name may be used by a lawyer in private practice if it does not imply a connection with a government agency or with a public or charitable legal services organization and is not otherwise in violation of Rule 7.1.

Since we didn’t plan on using a trade name, our main concern became 7.1, which prohibits “false and misleading statements” about the lawyer or lawyer’s services. That ties in with Rule 7.5(d) which awkwardly states:

Lawyers may state or imply that they practice in a partnership or other organization only when that is the fact.

So, we can’t make any false or misleading statements, and we can’t state that we are in a “partnership or other organization” if we are not. In my mind, that eliminates anything that talks about multiple law offices or associates. We have neither at the moment.

Similarly, a “law group” sounds like more than two people. To stay safe, we are just using CamsonRigby, LLC as our name for business purposes. We plan on using “Attorneys at Law” for advertising purposes, to make it clear that we are lawyers.

This is an interesting ethical issue that I see attorneys cross the line on regularly. If you start a firm and there are associates, then the associates leave, technically you should change the law firm name. But that’s a real hassle. I’ve spoken to Eric Cooperstein about this issue, and I agree with his thoughts:

The opinions on this issue are technically correct but they reflect the tendency of some courts and disciplinary agencies to over-regulate lawyers on advertising issues. I’m not aware of any actual instances in which consumers were misled by a law firm name. The use of “& Associates” is not likely any more misleading than law firm names that include dead or retired partners in their names. Sometimes law firms expand and contract. They should not have to worry about changing their firm name when the composition of the firm temporarily changes.

As new fish, we wanted to err on the side of caution. So “Attorneys at Law” it is.

State Regulations on Law Firm Names

In Pennsylvania, there can only be one corporation with the same name. This means that once you decide on the name, you have to make sure nobody has already taken it. Review the rules of incorporation for your state to see if there are similar restrictions. There may also be documents you need to file and fees you need to pay to create a fictitious name. Since we are using our last names, it is not a “fictitious name,” and we didn’t have to worry about that extra cost.


  1. Avatar Adam Lilly says:

    The fear of misleading people is why I go with “The Law Office [singular] of Adam Lilly”, and why I make it very plain on my website that I am a solo practitioner.

    By the way, being a new solo, I LOVE that you’re doing your new regular series. Lawyerist has lots of good stuff for running a firm, but there’s a different set of concerns when you’re just starting out.

    • Avatar Chris says:

      Adam, I’m graduating law school in 9 months. It’s my dream to start my own firm. What are some of the concerns you’re talking about with “just starting out”?

      • Avatar Adam Lilly says:

        The administrative things that have nothing to do with practicing law, mostly. Things like business licenses, malpractice insurance, business cards, advertising, websites, office space, office furnishing, how to present yourself and your firm to the public, general vs. niche practice, instituting systems for files and clients, credit card processing, engagement agreements, which equipment to use, which resources you’ll use for research, who you’ll ask to make sure you’re not screwing up, getting clients in the door, not feeling terrified once they’re there (note: knowledge brings confidence), learning how to practice straight out of school, the list goes on. Some issues, like the taxes, I’m still working out now.

    • Avatar Justin B says:

      Adam (and all readers),

      If you are focusing on just one area of practice, such as personal injury law, what is your take on including your area of practice in your name.

      For example, “______ Injury Firm, PC”?

      Would it be any better, or worse, to include the word “law” in the name as well?

      such as, “______ Injury Law Firm, PC”?

      I have selected a name for my firm, and I have filed with the secretary of state just a few days ago. I chose to go with the latter version (did not include “law”), but now I am feeling remorse. I am inclined to amend the name to include law because I feel as though the name may sound a bit more official, clear, and/or complete with the word “law” added in there.

      Your sincere advice and/or impressions in this regard would be very appreciated.

      Thank you.

  2. Avatar shg says:

    “The opinions on this issue are technically correct but they reflect the tendency of some courts and disciplinary agencies to over-regulate lawyers on advertising issues. I’m not aware of any actual instances in which consumers were misled by a law firm name.”

    So if Eric Cooperstein isn’t aware of a problem, lawyers can ignore court and discipline agency ethics decisions? Cool! Who knew?

    • I don’t know how you get from my quote to “lawyers can ignore court and discipline agency ethics decisions.” That clearly is not what I said. I only commented on the over-regulation of lawyers. If a lawyer chooses not to follow a law or regulation, he or she does so at his or her own risk.

  3. Avatar Joe says:

    Digging the new series. I just partnered up with a former colleague from the firm days and we are going through the same stuff. Just decided on Wilson Duval and now getting ready to incorporate. Looking forward to reading your posts.

    • Avatar Josh C. says:

      Congratulations! What made you decide on the order of your names? Rock paper scissors? Duel? Coin toss?

      We just learned a lesson about incorporation: read the forms carefully. We had to send the forms back in a second time. They had no problem cashing our check though…

      • Sam Glover Sam G. says:

        Did you change your mind and decide to be a corporation, then? What was your mistake?

        • Avatar Josh C. says:

          We didn’t check the box indicating that we are a restricted professional corporation, although we wrote it in another spot on the same form. Essentially it asks the question twice and we didn’t see the little check box. Being a “restricted professional corporation” of any type means they charge you the fee I referenced below. We are still going with an LLC though.

      • Avatar Joe says:

        Thanks! I essentially decided the order – we left the old firm at different times and she was working at another firm when I started solo. I picked up the web domain for Wilson Duval and then recruited her :)

        As for incorporating, we believe that for tax purposes choosing a professional corporation was better than an LLP because there is some savings on the self-employment tax and medicare contributions. When you max out the social security then there is less difference.

        California charges $100 for a PC registration and then the State Bar charges $200

  4. Avatar Will Geer says:

    I also have chosen The Law Office of Will B. Geer as my solo name of choice. I have also taken the advice of a tax attorney to keep it a sole proprietorship in the beginning, as the tax advantages of an LLC or P.C. would likely be swallowed by the increased administrative costs. Sam would probably disagree. As a new solo, your new column has me intrigued. Keep it up.

    • Avatar Adam Lilly says:

      I’m also a sole proprietorship for the time being. Having filed my taxes yesterday, I can already say I’m very happy with the decision at this point. I intend to probably keep it this way until I either have employees, or join up with someone to form a partnership – both of which are a ways off.

    • Avatar Josh C. says:

      From what I’ve read and the accountants I’ve spoken to you’re probably right. But since there are two of us, the LLC gives us a little bit more protection than just a plain partnership. Although PA really makes you pay for it. After your first year they charge you $460 per year, per member of the LLC. The fee only applies to doctors, lawyers, and possibly accountants. Ridiculous.

    • Sam Glover Sam G. says:

      I don’t disagree, actually. The only reason to form a company is for the liability protection, but other than client files—for which you cannot avoid liability—law firms don’t usually incur a lot of liability that can be shielded.

      That said, it’s not very expensive to form an LLC (corporations raise the accounting costs a bit more), and I think it makes you look more serious about what you are doing. Which is why I think it makes sense to adopt a firm name that doesn’t “sound small,” even if it is just you. For example, The Glover Law Firm sounds better to me than The Law Office of Sam Glover. That’s really just personal preference, though.

      • For lawyers, I don’t think you get much liability protection from an entity. Lawyers in most states are responsible for their own malpractice, landlord and other vendors will often make small firm lawyers sign personal guarantees, etc. There may be advantages to a corp over an LLC or a sole proprietorship for the tax treatment of various benefits, such as health insurance. Also, I agree with Sam that having an entity indicates a higher level of seriousness, perhaps sophistication, than may be conveyed by a sole proprietorship. In MN, the costs of starting an LLC are nominal and the annual fee after the first year is only $25.

        • Avatar ian says:

          Just a few points. For some, forming an LLC is very expensive. In NY,there is a publication requirement where you have to put notice of your entity in the newspaper and this can run $1500. This is why I decided on a professional corporation that was an S Corporation. Also, an S corporation and an LLC are pass through entities for tax purposes so they have the same income tax impact as if you were to be a sole prop. (was not sure if this came through as Adam mentioned that he filed a tax return as a solo and I understood that there was a perceived benefit. Also, the self employment tax benefit of an S corp. is very beneficial. (eg. make $150,000, give yourself a salary of $50K and as such you do not have to pay employment tax on the entire $150K). I believe in NY you can elect this treatment even if you form an LLC but I did not focus on this. Finally, I agree that from a malpractice perspective, these entities do not shield a lawyer against much. In NY, a professional corporation can not use the corporation status as a shield against malpractice so you have to get insurance. I suppose though that the limited liability status would still protect you against other potential liability. The name question is a really interesting one. I wanted to stay away from Law offices of..and actually did not want my name in the firm at all as I felt it implied a small operation (which of course it is). Still have to give this some thought.

          • Attorneys need to be VERY careful about being too aggressive with the S corporation/FICA minimization strategy, and consult carefully with a tax accountant or tax attorney. There has been some recent helpful case law on this point but I don’t have the cite. Over-aggressiveness in this area can cost you big time.

  5. Avatar Inga Stevens says:

    Timely topic for me, Josh. I am making changes in my practice, which I am only now really making an effort to develop after a year of not doing much.

    I am moving to another office location (larger and free parking for me and y clients.) I am still debating about changing the name to “Maine Disability Law” from “Inga Stevens, Attorney at Law.” Maine allows trade names. I only do SSDI/SSI now, and plan to add LTD/ERISA claims. I’d be interested in hearing opinions about the possible name change

    I am also a sole proprietor, and at this point don’t plan to change that until I am at the point where I need to hire staff.

  6. Avatar Dana Atchley says:

    In New York, may a lawyer ethically use just his (or her) first name, or a combination of his/her first and middle names, in the name of his/her firm or solo practice entity? For example, if my full name were Matthew James Carlson, could I practice under the name “Matthew James” or form a professional services entity (p.c. pllc) with the name Matthew James, PLLC?

    I’ve done a bit of research on the question and haven’t found anything; however, I am inclined to think the answer is “no” because the search function for the attorney directory on the NYS courts website requires that at least one letter of an attorney’s last name be included in the search query.

    Any thoughts or comments would be much appreciated.

    • Avatar Tsveta says:

      Hi Dana,

      I wonder if you found any answer to your question. I am planning to start as a sole proprietor, but my first name is very long and confusing. Can I name my firm “LAST NAME” Law Firm or do I have to include both, my first and last name?

      Thank you.


  7. Avatar Thomas says:

    This may sound like a dumb question but in NY at least, do you have to use your name as the company name, like First Name Last Name, LLC. Can you be creative and do something outside the box like “The Best Law Firm Ever, LLC” or “The Lawyer You Want To Know, LLC”.


  8. Avatar T. Benisheikh says:

    I am a young lawyer, barely 2years in private legal practice in a big law firm. I am planning to partner up with younger colleague in a bigger city. We want to operate under a trade name. Any advice, suggestion as to suitable trade names is welcome & appreciated.

  9. Avatar petercabrera says:

    Selecting the right domain name for your law firm or private practice is an important decision.The two elements go together. The shorter the name, the easier it is to remember. This may require using an acronym of the partner lawyers names instead of the full name of the firm, but most people have short attention spans. The shorter name will ultimately serve you better. A memorable name is simply a name people will easily remember.

Leave a Reply