How willing are law firm partners to replace first year associates with robots? The results are in (PDF), and it doesn’t look good for first year associates. Altman Weil, a legal consulting company, has just released its annual “Law Firms in Transition” survey of 320 large law firm managing partners. The survey measured things like firm optimism, growth, and financial performance. The bonus question asked how willing law firms would be to not just use artificial intelligence, but replace personnel with it. Here’s the survey question and responses:

Untitled

I guess the whole prediction about how robots aren’t going to replace lawyers isn’t going to pan out after all. Paralegals seem to be first on the chopping block, followed by first year associates, and on up the food chain. Only 20.3% believe that computers will never replace lawyers. Maybe the legal singularity is closer than we think.

Featured image: “Cyber communication design concept. Male robot and human holding hands with handshake.” from Shutterstock.

7 Comments

  1. legalofficeguru says:

    I wouldn’t hold my breath here. The unwritten part of the question, “Can you envision a law-focused ‘Watson’ replacing any of the following timekeepers in your firm in the next 5 to 10 years?”, is “… without the firm having to train it”, which is the assumption driving such overwhelmingly positive responses. After all, we’re talking about a profession that still hasn’t widely adopted document assembly technology more than two decades after its invention and complains that Microsoft Word isn’t “intuitive”.

  2. Paul Spitz says:

    Of course, if you replace all the first year associates with robots, eventually you won’t have any second or third year associates, and ultimately, no partners either.

  3. Cat Teague says:

    Do you think that robot time can be billed at the same rate as a paralegal, much less an attorney (first year associate or otherwise)?

Leave a Reply