At the National Law Journal, Professor Richard Hasen thinks the Supreme Court should be a bit more transparent when it makes changes to published opinions.

[T]he Supreme Court, which is, after all, an accountable public body, should take four basic steps to make its actions more transparent. None of these steps would require release of any private information about the court’s deliberations, or even the justices’ privately recorded certiorari votes ….

He’s absolutely right. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court can change its opinions without telling anyone is ridiculous. As Hasen rightly points out, these changes should be announced to the public (not just to the press corps).

His other suggestions — making court filings available to the public and easier to find on the SCOTUS website, and announce the schedule and release of opinions and orders — make a lot of sense, too.

(h/t Judge Dillard)

Featured image: “Panorama of the United States Supreme Court at dusk in Washington DC, USA” from Shutterstock.

The Small Firm Scorecard example graphic.

The Small Firm ScorecardTM

Is your law firm structured to succeed in the future?

The practice of law is changing. You need to understand whether your firm is positioned for success in the coming years. Our free Small Firm Scorecard will identify your firm’s strengths and weaknesses in just a few minutes.


  1. joeross says:

    Great post. I think you’d like SCOTUS Servo:

Leave a Reply