Torts Gone Wild: Liability for the “Increased Exit Speed” of Aluminum Baseball Bats

by Sam Glover on September 17, 2012 in Lawyering Skills

The downside to the fact that aluminum bats work better than wood bats is, apparently, a dozen million dollars or so in damages, if you are the bat manufacturer. The maker of Louisville Sluggers has had a run of bad days in court, paying $850,000 to a boy who was killed by a ball hit by one of its aluminum bats, and settling for $14.5 million with one who was injured.

Now, Louisville Slugger caught a break. On post-trial motions, the court overturned a $951,000 jury verdict, finding that “Fewer players would be injured if Little Leaguers used foam-rubber bats, but it doesn’t reasonably follow that manufacturers of wooden bats would then be liable for imparting “increased exit speed” to the ball.”

Read Baseball Bat Manufacturer Has Good Day in Court, At Last on Abnormal Use.

Start the conversation; leave a comment below!

If you want us to post your comment, make it coherent, relevant, and non-spammy. (Links in comments are no-followed, which means you won't get SEO juice for linking "California DUI Lawyer" to your website.)

When you post a comment on this blog, you grant us the right to modify or delete your comment, but we have no duty to do so.

Previous post:

Next post: