verdicts

This Australian guy won over $200,000 suing Google for delivering results associating him with the mob. The judge explained the jury verdict by saying Google search results are just like publishing a newspaper:

Google Inc. is like the newsagent that sells a newspaper containing a defamatory article. While there might be no specific intention to publish defamatory material, there is a relevant intention by the newsagent to publish the newspaper for the purposes of the law of defamation.

Read Australian wins $208k from Google for defamation on Phys.org (via The Verge).

9comments

I vaguely remember law school hypos involving intentional infliction of AIDS from Torts class. But this is no hypo. An Oregon woman contracted herpes from a dentist who didn’t want to wear a condom, so she sued. A jury found the dentist — who informed the plaintiff he had herpes after the act — 75% liable and awarded $900,000 for a rash of consequences she experienced. (via Jezebel).