No More Common Law “Release Rule” in California

by Sam Glover on August 24, 2012 in Lawyering Skills

Under the common law “release rule,” a settlement with one of several defendants releases the remaining defendants from liability. It doesn’t make a lot of sense, since there are many reasons why a plaintiff might want to settle with one defendant but keep going against the others. The California Supreme Court agreed, citing the “unjust and inequitable results” that can result from the rule — for both parties, although it was the plaintiff who was harmed in this case. In overturning the release rule, it sounds like the court basically adopted a Pierrenger release as the default, which plaintiffs and defendants often use to avoid the potential adverse effects of settling with one one of several defendants. [via WSJ Law Blog]

Start the conversation; leave a comment below!

If you want us to post your comment, make it coherent, relevant, and non-spammy. (Links in comments are no-followed, which means you won't get SEO juice for linking "California DUI Lawyer" to your website.)

When you post a comment on this blog, you grant us the right to modify or delete your comment, but we have no duty to do so.

Previous post:

Next post: