<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook ethics: it’s not about Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyerist.com/facebook-ethics-it%e2%80%99s-not-about-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyerist.com/facebook-ethics-it%e2%80%99s-not-about-facebook/</link>
	<description>the lawyering survival guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:30:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CStrusz</title>
		<link>http://lawyerist.com/facebook-ethics-it%e2%80%99s-not-about-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11088</link>
		<dc:creator>CStrusz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerist.com/?p=2665#comment-11088</guid>
		<description>What if the client has the idea of using a Facebook entry first, and brings it to the lawyers attention...  Can the comment or entry be used as evidence in a civil case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the client has the idea of using a Facebook entry first, and brings it to the lawyers attention&#8230;  Can the comment or entry be used as evidence in a civil case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Camson</title>
		<link>http://lawyerist.com/facebook-ethics-it%e2%80%99s-not-about-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-7782</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Camson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerist.com/?p=2665#comment-7782</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone is arguing that Facebook or any other social media site is the cause of these potential ethical violations. Instead, it is the attorneys&#039; casual approach to those sites. The mindset is often more relaxed when tweeting than when e-mailing a client. It&#039;s that kind of relaxed or casual mentality that can lead to attorneys inadvertently advertising, forming unintentional attorney-client relationships, or misstating the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone is arguing that Facebook or any other social media site is the cause of these potential ethical violations. Instead, it is the attorneys&#8217; casual approach to those sites. The mindset is often more relaxed when tweeting than when e-mailing a client. It&#8217;s that kind of relaxed or casual mentality that can lead to attorneys inadvertently advertising, forming unintentional attorney-client relationships, or misstating the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
